I'll say this from the beginning, you simply cannot satisfy everyone. Someone will always be disappointed in change, but change is good. Remember, this is racing. Someone is always going to win, and someone will always lose. In the perfect world we all win, no one loses, we have nice bikes, drive nice cars, have the perfect wife/husband, straight-A kids and not a worry in the world. Unfortunately we do not live in the perfect world.
This discussion is on over at Bikeclicks and copied and pasted from there.
http://www.bikeclicks.com/BikeCliques/Details/tabid/3161/aft/26440/asg/10/Default.aspx
There is no further commentary from me and the following block of text is unedited. (except for formatting and readability)
We all have the same goal--improve the OVCX Series.
Here are some thoughts on how we could do that by adjusting the daily schedule. Sorry for the length.
Many of these ideas come from what we've all read on here. I've also received some emails and discussed this stuff with some folks and used their ideas. In other words, this isn'tmy work, it's a collaboration.
For starters, here's some data. Excluding the UCI races in the series, here are the per-race average (mean) numbers for the 2010 OVCX through Infirmary Mound. The categories that typically race together are grouped, and the total-on-course numbers are given in red (this isn't 100%; promoters grouped races differently on occasion).
Elite Men 24.6 racers = 24.6 on course
Elite Women 10.5
Elite Men 35+ 10.7
Elite Men 45+ 9.8 = 31 riders on course
3 Men 24.6
3 Men 35+ 22
3 Men 45+ 18.2 = 65 riders on course
4 Men 35.1
4 Men 35+ 27.5
4 Men 45+ 18.5 = 81 riders on course
10-12 Juniors 17.1 (boys and girls) = 17 on course
3/4 Women 10.7
3/4 Women 35+ 9.6
Singlespeed 7.6 = 28 on course
13-14 Juniors 13.3 (boys and girls)
15-18 Juniors 5 (boys and girls) = 18 on course
Before we move on to proposed changes, question number 1 has to be, "Is there a better way?" We've got a great series. Should we mess with the daily schedule to try and make it better?
The folks that I've talked with the most think that we should. The input on this site seems to indicate that we should.
Question Number 2 is "What is ' better?'"
To the folks who've had direct input into this email, a "better" daily schedule is one that promotes more fun and morecompetitive racing while spreading the numbers of racers more equally across the time slots.
"Better" also means (1) better for the greatest number of racers, (2) not getting you to the race too early, (3) getting you home by dinner, (4) giving you the "right" amount of time to race, (5) having the fewest number of races on course at a time, and (6) when it's necessary to have more than one race on course at a time, pairing categories that are similar in abilityand providing an incentive for the different categories to race each other so it feels like one race.
"Better" means getting the most folks that we can get to come race the OVCX every week.
Of course, there's no way to design a daily schedule that's perfect for everyone. For every give there's a take. It's a difficult puzzle.
With all this in mind, here's a stab at an improved daily schedule. Be sure to read the Very Important Note. It's important.
Also take note of the riders on course with this schedule. It balances the numbers.
Finally, whatever daily schedule is adopted, it should be the EXACTLY THE SAME at every OVCX race except the UCI races.
9:30 4 Masters men 35+ /45+ 30 minutes
45 riders on course
Single start. Sort category placing from overall results.
Very Important Note: Series points for single start races like the 9:30 race would be awarded as if the race was one race. Call-ups would be based on these series' points so that racers are staged by their results in these races, not by category. A racer's category placing on the day would be reached by sorting the overall results.
For example, if the first 45+ placed 10th in the 9:30 race, he'd get the series points for 10th, not first-place points for 45+. Of course, he'd still be in first place for 45+ on the day and accumulate the most series points of any 45+ on the day. This method would mean that everyone is racing everyone on the course for series points even if not for category placings. This would apply to all single-start races--10-14s, 4 men 35/45+, 3 men 35/45+, 4 men and 15-18 juniors, and 1-2 men/1-2 men 35/45+. It would also apply to 4 women/4 women 35+ and 1-3 women/1-3 women 35+ because these groups start together despite being in a time slot that has a staggered start with a men's race.
10:15 4 women 30 minutes
4 women’s 35+
Singlespeed
28 riders on course
Stagger start SS/women (2 not 3 starts) Sort women's category placings from
overall women's results.
11:00 10-12/13-14 juniors 25 minutes (typically 3 laps)
31 riders on course
Single start. Sort category placing from overall results.
11:40 4 men 30 minutes
15-18 Juniors
40 riders on course
Single start. Sort category placing from overall results.
12:25 Kids 10 minutes
12:50 3 Masters men 35+ /45+ 40 minutes
40 riders on course
Single start. Sort category placing from overall results.
1:45 1-3 women 40 minutes $400
1-3 35+ women (All women race for the $400/10 places)
3 men
35 riders on course
Stagger start 3 men/women (2 not 3 starts) Sort women's category
placings from overall women's results.
1-2 35+/45+ men (Everyone races for $1500/20 places)
46 racers on course
Single start. Sort category placing from overall results.